| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Borlag Crendraven
Future Corps
Sleeper Social Club
309
   |
Posted - 2013.03.12 23:45:00 -
[1] - Quote
For all the "warnings" you are giving for people about C6's being the most dangerous of them all, yet it's mostly the C5's where the action is... Higher number of notable PVP'ing WH corps in there and as such the likelihood of good fights is higher there as well. |
Borlag Crendraven
Future Corps
Sleeper Social Club
309
|
Posted - 2013.03.13 05:55:00 -
[2] - Quote
Oxandrolone wrote:Winthorp wrote:Oxandrolone wrote: A lot of whinging about how bad my home and my neighbors are.... You guys are forever whinging about this yet the reasons you chose C6 over C5 are the same to the problems you have now. Solution - Move back to C5's where all the fun is at. I enjoyed c6's when we first move here, lots of farmers to slaughter, since they all been evicted your proposal sounds ok to me personally. Had a quicky look at the SSC killboard and you have a very respectable 111b this month, when i go deeper though its alot of k-space (which is still kills) but it doesnt look like much of your kills are c5's at all.
We don't restrict our fights into WH's or k-space, we prefer w-space obviously but if the chain is quiet but useful otherwise and we have low's or null's to use and abuse, we do go out on roams. That said, http://stats.whkills.info/ is quite revealing with us as #1 in isk killed in w-space, with a number almost twice as big as the next two listed, Bite Me and Bitten... As those are essentially the same, we can look further and come up with the conclusion that we've killed more than the rest of top 5 combined in w-space. So uh about that... |
Borlag Crendraven
Future Corps
Sleeper Social Club
309
|
Posted - 2013.03.15 09:02:00 -
[3] - Quote
Svodola Darkfury wrote:Casirio wrote:Borlag Crendraven wrote:For all the "warnings" you are giving for people about C6's being the most dangerous of them all, yet it's mostly the C5's where the action is... Higher number of notable PVP'ing WH corps in there and as such the likelihood of good fights is higher there as well. there's also 5x as many c5s so I don't think thats a valid claim. and Jack, I agree you. that was the joke :P This. The fact that there are 500 C5 systems and 100 C6 systems gives a limited resource style of play for C6s whereas C5s are so damn empty. Svo.
Both have a ton of empty systems, but with the C5's you have much more variety in who you run into, which can be both good and bad depending on what you're doing of course. Overall I'd say that C5 and C6 are both at about equal level when it comes to danger to a corp that's capable of defending itself properly, for a pure farmer setup a C6 would be more dangerous I suppose. |
Borlag Crendraven
Future Corps
Sleeper Social Club
309
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 11:26:00 -
[4] - Quote
Illipsys wrote:the difference is we've lived in c5>c5 for quite some time, have experienced the nights of endless rolling with nothing to show for it, and while yes the same can be said for c6 statics - having experienced both, i can honestly say you 'find' more in c6 space but it isn't necessarily an opportunity for a fight due to previously mentioned reasons...people can't control their dreads  the likelyhood of rolling into an inhabited hole is just statistically more likely ( unless someone can prove me wrong here? ) p.s we killed more in w-space in jan/feb than ssc, you're good bro - oxy was just pointing out a difference in our play styles.
I guess the only real conclusion we can come up with is that it all boils down to your activity levels, be it in the C5 or C6. If you are actively looking to do stuff and kill stuff, then surprise surprise, you get to do and kill stuff. Due to the unpredictable nature of all w-space, you can't really get any more scientific than that :P |
| |
|